published
June 5, 2026

Artificial Gating vs. Natural Gating [EXCERPT]

By
CAKE VENTURES
share
Twitter
White arrow icon pointing to the right
LinkedIn
White arrow icon pointing to the right
Medium
White arrow icon pointing to the right
Cake Ventures hero logo with a transparent background

In tandem with technology, demographic change is one of the driving forces behind today’s market expansion. Demographic changes are broad shifts in population over time that materially impact user behavior and long-term demand. In venture, these changes signal emerging market opportunities, shifts in product-market fit, and the expansion of addressable markets.

<br></br>
But looking through a demographic lens has sometimes caused founders to do unnatural things to narrow their market. As a founder, you could end up honing your base prematurely, defining your users too rigidly, or creating a product that feels more “for these people” than “for the way these people behave.”

<br></br>

That is artificial gating.

<br></br>

I’ve invested in artificially gated startups, and other smart investors have too. Artificially gated startups are not inherently bad or wrong, but, like any startup, they can be more or less likely to result in companies that scale to the size needed in venture.

<br></br>

Natural gating, on the other hand, occurs when users behave in ways that create a product targeted to their behavior — not because of who they are, but because of how they behave.

<br></br>

The divide between these two concepts is this: built for a group vs. built for a behavior that happens to correlate with a large group.

Read the rest on the Cake Mix Substack

Artificial Gating vs. Natural Gating by Monique Woodard

The Demographic Choices That Can Kill a Startup or Deliver Venture Scale

Read on Substack

Quote text here

- Founder and company details here

What are you Building?

LET Us KNOW
White arrow icon pointing to the right